Do you know about the Land Adjacent to 46B Chelford Road?
It could have been an asset for our community. Allotments, a community garden, or even a children’s play area. Instead, it’s been laid to waste for years - a woefully unmaintained and overgrown dumping ground.
Why? Because an ethically challenged individual, called Wendy, decided to put a fence around it and falsely claim it as her own. The twist? It’s never belonged to her. She’s never held the deed nor the title; it’s an act of pure subterfuge.
Now she’s trying to sell the land to out-of-town property developers, who’ll make £1,000,000 by building on this shameless act of squatting.
The land has become a thriving haven for wildlife and plantlife. Their proposed development will eradciate the habitat of bats, birds and badgers, and lay waste to pollution reducing trees and shrubs.
There's only left:
Submit an objection to Cheshire East
Council now
Click here to object
Look for the link that says "Comment on this application" under "Available Actions" · It takes 2 minutes
Weasely Wendy’s a Shady Squatter.
She’s squatted the land, and now she’s attempting to use a draconian right called adverse possession to claim ownership. She’s even agreed a deal with an opportunistic out-of-town developer, some blaggers from Blackpool.
Between them, they’re attempting to push through a planning application for a large scale development. Their own website refers to the land as “a challenging, narrow plot”. That’s because the plot isn’t suitable for two massive detached houses.
Broken Cross Developments Limited, with a registered office in London and shareholders in Blackpool, plan to make £1 million from this shameless land grab.
You can view the plot on Google Maps here
There's only left:
Submit an objection to Cheshire East
Council now
Click here to object
Look for the link that says "Comment on this application" under "Available Actions" · It takes 2 minutes
- Do you want to lose one of the few remaining green pockets in Broken Cross? The natural habitats and open spaces of Broken Cross have already been decimated by property development.
- Do you want unscrupulous squatters and opportunistic out-of-town developers lining their coffers with land that should belong to the community?
- Do you want even more strain on our oversubscribed local schools and infrastructure?
- Do you want our already illegal levels of PM pollution to increase even more?
- Do you want even more collisions at the problematic Broken Cross crossroads?
- Do you think Cheshire East should enable squatters to profit?
No? Then help us stop Wendy.
There's only left:
Submit an objection to Cheshire East
Council now
Click here to object
Look for the link that says "Comment on this application" under "Available Actions" · It takes 2 minutes
How to object effectively
You can use this pre-written objection
The proposed development at the land adjacent to 46B Chelford Road presents a series of significant concerns, chief among them being the unsuitability of its layout and density. The planned structures are excessively large for the plot, encroaching on the space of neighbouring properties and overshadowing their homes. This not only disrupts the area's aesthetics but also significantly reduces access to natural light for adjacent residents, impacting their quality of life.
Environmentally, the development poses alarming risks. The introduction of potentially 16 new residents and additional vehicles will escalate noise, light pollution, and traffic congestion. Chelford Road, especially near the Whirley Road junction, is ill-equipped for such an increase, heightening highway safety concerns.
Ecologically, the impact is profound. The green space serves as a vital habitat for local wildlife, including bats, birds, and badgers. Destroying this habitat and the loss of significant trees and vegetation, some under Tree Preservation Orders, will displace these species and exacerbate pollution levels.
The land's propensity for accumulating surface water also raises serious flooding concerns. Developing this area disrupts natural water management, increasing flood risks for surrounding properties.
Crucially, the ownership of the land is under a questionable claim of adverse possession, lacking legitimate documentation such as a deed or title. This dubious claim raises substantial legal and moral objections. Proceeding with the development under these circumstances sets a concerning precedent, endorsing the acquisition of land through questionable means for profit. This undermines community values, fair play, and presents legal and ethical dilemmas.
In summary, the development of land adjacent to 46B Chelford Road is objectionable, posing considerable risks to the community, environment, and legal integrity.
Or you can write your own objection, on the basis of:
- The layout and density of the buildings: they’re clearly too big for the plot, sitting unreasonably close to the neighbouring properties boundaries.
- Loss of daylight or sunlight and Overshadowing/loss of outlook: the buildings will block vital sunlight to neighbouring residents, significantly degrade their outlook and cast shadow over their land.
- Noise and disturbance from use, light pollution: the new houses can accommodate upwards of 16 new residents; that’s a lot of additional lighting and vehicular noise - on plots that have never been artificially lit.
- Highway safety issues and traffic generation: upwards of 4 new cars accessing the already problematic Chelford Road, close to the dangerously sharp Whirley Road junction.
- Nature conservation and Intrusion into the Open Countryside: there are no dwellings between 46b and 52 Chelford Road. Developing this plot will diminish wild life (bats, birds and even badgers have been observed). Destruction of planting and vegetation will lead to increased levels of pollution.
- Loss of important trees: there are very mature trees on the adjacent plots that will inevitably incur root damage. There are trees on the plot that are subject to TPOs.
- Risk of flooding: the land spends most of its time submerged in surface water. If the developers fill it with concrete, where is that water supposed to go? The neighbouring home owners will suffer increased flooding.
- A moral objection: the council must not be seen to be developers to reap huge profits from land obtained through squatting.
There's only left:
Submit an objection to Cheshire East
Council now
Click here to object
Look for the link that says "Comment on this application" under "Available Actions" · It takes 2 minutes